The Innovation Pathway Curve of Understanding

One of my recent articles outlined a three horizon framework for innovation. Let me extend this a little further. I’m sure we all agree Innovation needs to be worked at, it needs to be understood and often many people do get confused by not taking a more measured approach to the need to break innovation down into its manageable parts. Innovation does not just have a time axis that the three horizons framework refers too but it has a complexity and scope axis in learning as well.

By taking a more systematic approach to any innovation you achieve a greater understanding over time of what is involved.

Firstly you have to ask what you are trying to achieve, is it incremental innovation, distinctive, disruptive or even radical white space innovation? Do you approach innovation differently for each of these? I would argue you need to learn and build from one to another as you learn on the way, this is my going up a curve that increases in complexity and its scope/ outcome.

How do we embed innovation in all its forms needs what I feel is a unique approach that I have called the Pathway Curve Methodology

Getting a thorough understanding of what it takes to move up what I call this Innovation curve, does takes time, and growing a deeper understanding of how one step is followed by another in experience and understanding needs working upon. This is rarely understood and practiced in this structured way and that lack of understanding often creates the disappointment and frustrations that an organization is not achieving that innovation success they desire. The more you move steadily up this curve the more you can explore the different types of innovation with growing confidence and success.

There are five separate curves of learning– 1) dealing systematically with obstacles, 2) building capability and capacity to move methodically up this curve, 3) the building and understanding of different approaches to innovation for growth building, 4) recognizing the organizational impact and knowledge needed and finally, 5) a discovery and transformation curve.

Let me illustrate one of these five learning curves to provide a little more of an understanding by taking the aspects of needed learning for organizational impact, gaining improved return (ROI), controlling of costs and increased visibility.

Organizational Impact Curve

Recognizing and working upon the five learning curves together is important

You need to be very structured in this approach, it may look like a slow build but in any ‘fitness’ requirement you build in a methodical way. What is it to achieve, is it incremental, distinctive, radical, disruptive and how do you manage this in a clear way to support any initiative.

Understanding your fitness, landscape and dynamics for innovation is essential

In future blogs I will expand on the need to plot your Innovation Fitness Landscape and the ability to identify your organizations Dynamics of Innovation.

Progressively we will be moving towards the DNA of Innovation much of the intent that this blog is all about.

Save

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “The Innovation Pathway Curve of Understanding

  1. Pingback: Innovation Excellence | Shifting Paradigms – Refreezing for Innovation

  2. Woudn’t time and intensity be negatively correlated? Also, time is a good measure but wouldn’t urgency be a better measure than intensity? Intensity is pretty hard to measure, and certainly has many more dimensions than does time. As theory your work looks pretty good, but if you were to subject it to a formal research process it might require you to be a bit more specific/focused. Would really love to see you subject this to a formal research effort.

    Like

    • Actually time and intensity works. Think about it- how much time does it take each person or organization to travel through the different zones of understanding is dependent on the intensity of purpose, their commitment etc. Intensity is not so hard to measure, you need to work at it- time put in, activities involved, training undertaken etc., etc. Urgency runs the risk, you pass through a phase before you have ‘mastered it’ and it can infer being pushed by others. Moving this into a formal research effort would be nice but it is working out the logistics of what you need to learn will partly determine the path milestones. Thanks for your post reply

      Like

  3. Pingback: Balancing Our Innovation Understanding | Paul4innovating's Innovation Views

  4. Pingback: Innovation | Pearltrees

  5. Pingback: Building the Core Competencies for Innovation | Paul4innovating's Innovation Views

  6. Pingback: Covering Innovation My Way | Paul4innovating's Innovation Views

  7. Pingback: Covering Innovation My Way- test – Innovation Academy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s